Thank you, Jeff. Let ADs discuss it when the document comes to the IESG. Regards, Greg
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 3:39 AM Jeffrey Haas <jh...@pfrc.org> wrote: > Greg, > > On Feb 27, 2022, at 7:54 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > of course, the WG can send the document IESG on its current track. What is > not clear to me is what is being standardized by the document. It appears > that everything described is a local behavior that does not affect any > other BFD system. Is my understanding correct? Or I'm missing something? > I also have some follow-up notes to share with the authors. > > > See the cited message from the OPS AD. > > I suggest not spending energy fighting this point in the Working Group. > Feel free to direct your questions directly to Rob. > > -- Jeff > > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/vOMZl9ucZwNKu5_MHHti-4ImOjQ/# >> > >
