Greg, > On Feb 27, 2022, at 7:54 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > of course, the WG can send the document IESG on its current track. What is > not clear to me is what is being standardized by the document. It appears > that everything described is a local behavior that does not affect any other > BFD system. Is my understanding correct? Or I'm missing something? > I also have some follow-up notes to share with the authors.
See the cited message from the OPS AD. I suggest not spending energy fighting this point in the Working Group. Feel free to direct your questions directly to Rob. -- Jeff > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/vOMZl9ucZwNKu5_MHHti-4ImOjQ/# > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/vOMZl9ucZwNKu5_MHHti-4ImOjQ/#>
