I did added RFC9127 based on Jeff information (in many places of XML as
comment)
Fixed reference in the YANG to accommodate new number.
Fell free to comment it out so RFC editor can quickly adjust :)
Best,
R.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 8:19 PM Reshad Rahman <res...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Also, starting from rev-04 (I think) we incorrectly have RFC9127 as the
> reference for the revision. I will change it back to YYYY.
>
> revision 2021-10-15 {
> description "Initial revision.";
> reference "RFC 9127: A YANG data model for BFD unsolicited";
> }
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 20, 2021, 10:47:05 AM EDT, Jeffrey Haas <
> jh...@pfrc.org> wrote:
>
>
> $ pyang --ietf --max-line-length 69 ietf-bfd-unsolicited\@2021-10-15.yang
> ietf-bfd-unsolici...@2021-10-15.yang:17: warning: imported module
> "ietf-bfd" not used
> ietf-bfd-unsolici...@2021-10-15.yang:22: warning: imported module
> "ietf-bfd-ip-sh" not used
> ietf-bfd-unsolici...@2021-10-15.yang:128: warning: line length 71 exceeds
> 69 characters
>
> The following line needs to be split:
> "BFD IP single-hop interface unsolicited top level container";
>
>
>
