dmnks left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3671)
> I am personally not a fan of the "The _rpmXXX_ command takes no arguments."
> sections. I guess this was discussed in the template PR while I was not
> looking. So if this is not new standard so be it.
Oh, I agree. Had a similar passing thought in the template PR. I don't think we
actually discussed this, Indeed, the standard could be that if a section
doesn't apply, it should be omitted.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3671#issuecomment-2751349473
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3671/c2751349...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
