Hi, since posting the question I did have a look at the Control settings in Studio/Manage Midi Devices and found the relevant parameters (I know! I should have done this before posting! ><). It seems that Reverb control on the M3 is set using a value of 93 and this was allocated to Chorus within RG. I swapped these values and (after a restart) the Reverb 'knob' now controls M3 Reverb (Result!).
As you say Michael these things are device specific and the developers can't be expected to cater for any more than GM. However, maybe there is scope for including some of these settings in the Voice Program files (*.rgd) that are contributed by users. That way it gets covered to the extent that is felt necessary by the user base, without such a huge effort on the part of the developers (to whom great thanks are owed for a great program). Of course it could be that there is so much variety in the way that manufacturers implement these features that even this would not be a practical solution. Best wishes, Chuck. On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 15:58 -0400, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On 04/26/2014 06:23 AM, chuck elliot wrote: > > > I have found that the reverb on my Korg M3 is > > controlled by the "Chorus" control in RG and not > > by the "Reverb" 'knob'. > > Is there a way I can correct this? > > In general you want to play with Studio -> Manage MIDI Devices... and go > make manual edits to the controller setup. In this specific case, > however, I went and grabbed the manuals for this beast and 20 minutes > later I'm scratching my head. The words "reverb" and "chorus" don't > even appear in the manual anywhere, and it appears to be a very unique > and massively non-standard piece of kit where every single factory > program might use different controllers for different purposes. > > Rosegarden is not well suited to control such a beast, having been > designed with General MIDI in mind. It isn't that Rosegarden is only > suitable for GM, but GM is the model we had in mind when we designed it, > and anything that is massively non-GM just doesn't fit the model very > efficiently, and falls into a big gray area. > > I don't know what I could manage to do with it if I had one. I'm sure I > could figure something out somehow. It's much too complicated a thing > for me to figure out without access to and experience with the actual > hardware though.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform
_______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
