On 01/08/2013 10:42 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:

>> OK, rosegarden compiled faster than I expected, so I gave it a run. I
>> think there's a slight mistake, it should be:

I didn't do any research into the question of whether we were using the 
\GrandStaff context in the surrounding code blocks for some reason that 
conflicted with the reason behind the new code block.  I flipped a coin, 
and guessed wrong, apparently.

Since you've already made the change (thanks for the patch) I guess 
you've tested that it performs as expected?  Have you tried this with 
staff brackets in place?  I actually wrote all the staff grouping stuff 
myself, years ago, but I don't remember how it works.  Development is 
funny that way.  I was afraid, while knocking together this current 
thing, I might accidentally break all of that other work by going the 
wrong way here.  I know the staff grouping stuff is fragile and easy to 
break.  I barely got it working, and it's not robust.
-- 
D. Michael McIntyre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS
and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user

Reply via email to