On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:28:58PM -0800, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 02:26:39PM -0500, D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
[...]
> > I knocked together a new option and set it up so inserting this
> > snippet in the layout block is the new default behavior. You don't
> > have to do anything to turn it on, but if you really want to print all
> > the empty staves, you can suppress the new behavior by turning a
> > checkbox on.
> >
> > I banged this out in a hurry and did only extremely minimal testing.
> > There could be lots of problems, and it would be extremely helpful if
> > you could put it through its paces and reassure me that it's
> > reasonably robust and predictable.
>
> I'll get back to you once I try it out. Thanks!
[...]
OK, rosegarden compiled faster than I expected, so I gave it a run. I
think there's a slight mistake, it should be:
\context { \Staff \RemoveEmptyStave }
But right now it generates:
\context { \GrandStaff \RemoveEmptyStave }
which doesn't have the expected effect.
T
--
IBM = I'll Buy Microsoft!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS
and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
