My review of Mittemeijer’s book  seems to have excited interest in the history 
of the “Rietveld” method. I, myself,  recall using Alan’s modified program 
(incorporating anisotropic displacement parameters, a welcome addition) in the 
early days and I saw that many Rietveld programs also contained this original 
code. Alan should have received much more recognition for this.

How about getting together and writing an article on the history of the program 
for the IUCr Newsletter? You could discuss the controversy there too for a 
larger audience.  The Newsletter is read by more than 13500 people, and I 
encourage including controversy.
Regards
Mike


Professor A.M. Glazer
Department of Physics
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3PU
Tel/Fax: 44 1865 272290
Mobile: 0778 696 0537
******************************************
Emeritus Professor of Physics and Emeritus  Fellow of Jesus College Oxford
Visiting Professor at the University of Warwick
Crystallographer
Editor of the Newsletter of the IUCr https://www.iucr.org/news/newsletter
******************************************
"Men will be proud to say 'I am a European'. We hope to see a day when men of 
every country will think as much of being a European as of being from their 
native land". W.Churchill, Sword Beach Memorial.

" Je ne te parlerai que cristaux" L. Pasteur (1850)
Video of my Bragg Lecture at the Royal Institution is at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9bMEUr2II4
with questions at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsPBB6azzX4



From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr <rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr> On Behalf Of Alan W 
Hewat
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 5:40 PM
To: Le Bail Armel <le-bail.ar...@orange.fr>
Cc: rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Re: Rietveld condamnation considered as established by some more people

Armel, it's not about you :-) But in your 1988 paper you did not reference 
Pawley (1980) and even Rietveld only appeared as #14
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228084768_Ab_Initio_Structure_Determination_of_LiSbWO6_by_X_ray_Powder_Diffraction#fullTextFileContent

But let's not change the subject. You have published comments, linked to in 
your opening post, accusing respected scientists of "Calumny... towards a dead 
man who cannot defend himself". Simply because people who have direct 
experience of the history (which is often about dead men) do not agree with you.

And yes, Columbus did not discover America either, but he contributed. Be 
content with contributing, and let it go.

Regards Alan
________________________________
Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics
Grenoble, FRANCE (from phone)
alan.he...@neutronoptics.com<mailto:alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
+33.476984168 VAT:FR79499450856
http://NeutronOptics.com/hewat
_______________________________


On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, 17:49 Le Bail Armel, 
<le-bail.ar...@orange.fr<mailto:le-bail.ar...@orange.fr>> wrote:
>And there are other examples. See this brief review of "Whole Pattern Fitting 
>- The Pawley Method" (1980) yet few people now attribute this kind of profile 
>refinement to Pawley. http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/solve1/pawley.htm

Few people ? At least me :

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/iucr/itc/Ha/ch3o5v0001/sec3o5o2o2o1/?

And 2168 papers cite the 1980 Pawley paper according to Google Scholar as of 
today.

Be more clear. What are exactly those other examples ?

ALB
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to