Given the involvement of Alan in the early days I would be confident to trust 
his view.

So why we don't try to fix a bit the mistake. We could:
- start renaming this list as Loopstra-Rietveld list ;-) ( I would keep the 
name Rietveld in hit, first who got the idea, second the programmer)
- start using Loopstra-Rietveld in our papers/preentations/schools and use the 
proper references.

For America, I will start calling the first who just went to the islands with 
his proper name: Cristoforo Colombo. Why do you want to change it for different 
languages? 
I would not like if they would call me Lukas Lutterottus !

Finally, Alan, why we don't get a history of Loopstra-Rietveld programs? 
Speaking with different programmer I know most of them are originating 
indirectly from the Rietveld code and I think it is interesting to see how many 
are derived from others and have a root on the original code.

Luca

 <http://www.unitn.it/>

Luca Lutterotti
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale
Università di Trento
via Sommarive, 9 - 38123 Trento (Italy)
tel. +39 0461 2824-14 (Office), -34 (X-Ray lab)




Maud: http://maud.radiographema.com <http://maud.radiographema/>


> On 17 Aug 2023, at 10:40, Alan W Hewat <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com> wrote:
> 
> Armel, it's not about you :-) But in your 1988 paper you did not reference 
> Pawley (1980) and even Rietveld only appeared as #14
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228084768_Ab_Initio_Structure_Determination_of_LiSbWO6_by_X_ray_Powder_Diffraction#fullTextFileContent
> 
> But let's not change the subject. You have published comments, linked to in 
> your opening post, accusing respected scientists of "Calumny... towards a 
> dead man who cannot defend himself". Simply because people who have direct 
> experience of the history (which is often about dead men) do not agree with 
> you. 
> 
> And yes, Columbus did not discover America either, but he contributed. Be 
> content with contributing, and let it go.
> 
> Regards Alan 
> ________________________________
> Dr Alan Hewat, NeutronOptics
> Grenoble, FRANCE (from phone)
> alan.he...@neutronoptics.com
> +33.476984168 VAT:FR79499450856
> http://NeutronOptics.com/hewat <http://neutronoptics.com/hewat>
> _______________________________
>    
> 
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2023, 17:49 Le Bail Armel, <le-bail.ar...@orange.fr 
> <mailto:le-bail.ar...@orange.fr>> wrote:
>>> >And there are other examples. See this brief review of "Whole Pattern 
>>> >Fitting - The Pawley Method" (1980) yet few people now attribute this kind 
>>> >of profile refinement to Pawley. 
>>> >http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/solve1/pawley.htm
>>> 
>>> Few people ? At least me :
>> https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/iucr/itc/Ha/ch3o5v0001/sec3o5o2o2o1/?
>> 
>> And 2168 papers cite the 1980 Pawley paper according to Google Scholar as of 
>> today.
>> 
>> Be more clear. What are exactly those other examples ?
>> 
>> ALB
>> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
> Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
> The Rietveld_L list archive is on 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to