Seems that Rietveld had not the same opinion and claimed for ideas too
and possibly for mathematics as well.
Best,
Armel
Armel,
For the sake of the scientific exchange of ideas and facts, too bad that
Dr. Rietveld is not alive.
Regards,
Miguel Delgado
On 8/19/2018 6:21 PM, Le Bail Armel wrote:
*>".../the method did not suddenly appear in a flash of inspiration of
a single person, but was the result of the work of three
individuals... Loopstra, van Laar and Rietveld./".*
And more precisely :
" HS wrote in Dutch:
‘Loopstra had the idea that it should be better to use the whole
powder profile rather than estimated intensities to solve structures,
van Laar worked it out mathematically and Rietveld programmed it."
I conclude then :
no idea for Rietveld and van Laar since they are from Loopstra;
no mathematics for Rietveld and Loopstra;
no programming for Loopstra and van Laar.
A very clear result of the work of three individuals. The HS view...
Seems that Rietveld had not the same opinion and claimed for ideas too
and possibly for mathematics as well.
Best,
Armel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
