Hi Kotaro

ATZ is the Z*Mw*f that you were calculating. You can find it described in the 
FullProf manual .pdf file around page 91 (or search for “ATZ”), and it is given 
for each phase in the line :

!Nat Dis Ang Pr1 Pr2 Pr3 Jbt Irf Isy Str Furth       ATZ    Nvk Npr More

You can calculate it yourself, but the program also calculates a value for you 
for each phase, so if you are unsure and want to check, you can just take that 
value. Especially if you refine occupancies, the programs’ value can change 
from what you have entered. It will however take the values you enter, not the 
ones it calculates (unless there is a way to get it to accept the calculated 
values?)

Sometimes I also find it useful to use the ATZ calculated for the framework of 
a structure, and not for example the ATZ including loosely bound water and 
exchanged cations. But that’s another story.

I hope I understood the question and that this helps a bit. ☺

Regards,
Arto


From: rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr [mailto:rietveld_l-requ...@ill.fr] On Behalf Of 
Kotaro SAITO
Sent: den 24 februari 2015 11:53
To: Rietveld_l@ill.fr
Subject: Quantitative phase analysis on FullProf

Dear Rietvelders,

Does anyone know how FullProf calculates weight fractions “Fract(%)” in a .sum 
file? or Is there any known bugs for calculating ATZ?

According to the manual, it seems that ATZ is used for calculating the 
values... but no further information is written in the manual.
I am also wondering, in my case, why different phases have the exact same value 
for ATZ. It should be different for different materials from the definition in 
the manual.
Here are the related descriptions in my .out file.
        Phase 1
        => The given value of ATZ is        688.48 the program has calculated:  
      4345.96
        Phase 2
        => The given value of ATZ is        688.48 the program has calculated:  
       576.91
I confirmed that 4345.96 and 576.91 seem to be Z*Mw

I calculated the weight fractions using the values in the sum file and a 
equation Wp=S_p(ZMV)_p/ΣS_i(ZMV)_i (R. J. Hill and C. J. Howard, J Appl. 
Cryst., 20, 467-474), and ended up in getting quite different fractions from 
those in the .sum file. I got 97.3% and 2.7% with my calculation and the values 
in the .sum file are like this.
        Phase 1
        => Bragg R-factor:   2.74       Vol:  941.374( 0.009)  Fract(%):   
82.46( 0.85)
        => Rf-factor=  1.81             ATZ:         688.475   Brindley:  1.0000
        Phase 2
        => Bragg R-factor:   7.65       Vol:  137.093( 0.079)  Fract(%):   
17.54( 0.97)
        => Rf-factor=  5.35             ATZ:         688.475   Brindley:  1.0000


When I ran an example pcr for quantitative phase analysis in Examples 
(si3n4r.pcr), I got ATZ and weight fractions below
Si3N4 alpha
 => The given value of ATZ is        560.00 the program has calculated:         
561.14
Si3N4 beta
 => The given value of ATZ is        280.00 the program has calculated:         
280.57

 => Phase:  1      Si3 N4 alpha
 => Bragg R-factor:  0.969       Vol:  292.623( 0.016)  Fract(%):   92.88( 0.44)
 => Rf-factor= 0.600             ATZ:         560.000   Brindley:  1.0000

 => Phase:  2      Si3 N4 beta
 => Bragg R-factor:   2.26       Vol:  145.711( 0.027)  Fract(%):    7.12( 0.09)
 => Rf-factor=  1.09             ATZ:         280.000   Brindley:  1.0000

and the these fractions are consistent with those derived from the equation 
Wp=S_p(ZMV)_p/ΣS_i(ZMV)_i.

I would like to know which weight fractions I should trust for my case…

Best regards,

Kotaro

//================//================//
  Kotaro SAITO
  High Energy Accelerator Research Organization
  Institute of Materials Structure Science
  1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0801, Japan
//================//================//
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list 
<alan.he...@neutronoptics.com<mailto:alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr<mailto:lists...@ill.fr>> eg: HELP as the 
subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to