>Depends on the lattice? Cubic patterns look great in old "Q": >eg: "Tables of Q as a Function of 2theta" Acta Cryst 12, 421, (1959) >... where Q was 10^4/d^2.
Yes, it does "en principe" depend on the lattice of course :-) but 10^4/d^2 still provides a better "constant peak density scale" than any other simple function I can think of. Certainly a lot better than a linear d-spacing scale. And yes, this is not a new idea. Alan. _____________________________________________________________ Dr Alan Hewat, ILL Grenoble, FRANCE<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>fax+33.476.20.76.48 +33.476.20.72.13 (.26 Mme Guillermet) http://www.ill.fr/dif/people/hewat/ _____________________________________________________________
