On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 3:17 AM <kowa...@denic.de> wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > On 14.01.25 17:46, Andrew Newton (andy) wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 1:25 PM <kowa...@denic.de> wrote: > >> On a side note - forbidding registration will also block the original > >> authors from registering them to make their registration compliant. A bit > >> of paradox. > >> > > Are you talking past each other? Section 5 lists extensions that are > > already registered. Why would the authors need to re-register them? > > [PK] This discussion is about the extension identifiers fred_version_0, > artRecord_level_0, platformNS_level_0 and regType_level_0 which are not > registered and should have been. > > Maybe I was ahead of myself by thinking that the mentioned change in > IANA considerations would just block registration of those mentioned > identifiers. > > So just to consider when drafting the new text, that rules in the IANA > considerations and in 2.2 don't forbid registering these identifiers for > the original extensions.
Ah. Ok. Agreed. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
