In the interest of keeping forward momentum, I think this is a good idea. But to set expectations, with such large changes there may be a need for a -20 to settle on the smaller details.
-andy On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:03 PM Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com> wrote: > > Are there any concerns if we post draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-19 as proposed > below, which is to revert to draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-17 with the support > for one or two email addresses using either ASCII or SMTPUTF8, remove any > reference to the requirement for an ASCII email address, and remove the > concept of a transition period? This will leave the decision related to what > combination of e-mail addresses to support to server policy. If there are no > concerns, Dmitry and I will post draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-19 as proposed. > > > > _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
