Thursday, 3 August 2023 20:14:41 CEST writes:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 1:23 PM Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com> wrote:
So, rollback to draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-17 with the concept
of a transition period removed and inclusion of "at least one
of the email values MUST be an ASCII address"?
Doesn't that put us back to requiring two email addresses to support EAI?
I was thinking that "if more than one email value is provided, one
MUST be an ASCII address". Therefore the options are:
1) provide an ASCII email address.
2) provide an SMTPUTF8 email address.
3) provide both
There is, of course, the possibility of a hack... "At least one of the
contact addresses MUST be an ASCII address. This restriction may be lifted
in a future revision of this document."
The draft will still need text such as provided by Arnt to justify option 2.
And I agree with removing the transition period.
I'll be happy to provide suitable text. Massaging what I wrote to fit the
context.
Arnt
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
