Dear Arnt, On Sun, 6 Aug 2023, 13:39 Arnt Gulbrandsen, <a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote:
> Thursday, 3 August 2023 20:14:41 CEST writes: > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 1:23 PM Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com> wrote: > >> > >> So, rollback to draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-17 with the concept > >> of a transition period removed and inclusion of "at least one > >> of the email values MUST be an ASCII address"? > > > > Doesn't that put us back to requiring two email addresses to support EAI? > > > > I was thinking that "if more than one email value is provided, one > > MUST be an ASCII address". Therefore the options are: > > 1) provide an ASCII email address. > > 2) provide an SMTPUTF8 email address. > > 3) provide both > > There is, of course, the possibility of a hack... "At least one of the > contact addresses MUST be an ASCII address. This restriction may be lifted > in a future revision of this document." > > > The draft will still need text such as provided by Arnt to justify > option 2. > > > > And I agree with removing the transition period. > > I'll be happy to provide suitable text. Massaging what I wrote to fit the > context. > It would be great, many thanks in advance!
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
