Hi alessandro,
Il 20/02/2022 13:17, Alessandro Vesely ha scritto:
On Wed 16/Feb/2022 15:54:01 +0100 Mario Loffredo wrote:
For what is worth, I would proceed as in the following:
1) If a contact with the abuse role exists:
1.a) If at least one pref parameter exists, I would return only the
most preferred email address;
1.b) If the pref parameter is missing, I would return all the email
addresses in order of appearance.
2) If a contact with the abuse role is missing, I would return no
abuse email address
Hope It could be helpful.
Yup, that's an applicable hint. I'd suggest to publish it as a
default profile in the next RFC. (I don't know how to get profiles,
let alone parsing them. Having a default profile allows to make sense
of APNIC's preferences.)
Don't think this is a matter of an RFC.
What I suggested, it can be valid as a general rule applicable to every
RDAP respone provided that the server returns a contact with the abuse role.
For example, it can be applied to APNIC's abuse contacts as well as to
the abuse contacts returned by the gTLDs' RDAP servers according to what
is stated in Section 2.4.5 of
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rdap-response-profile-15feb19-en.pdf
Best,
Mario
Best
Ale
--
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Technological Unit “Digital Innovation”
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
