On Wed 16/Feb/2022 15:54:01 +0100 Mario Loffredo wrote:
For what is worth, I would proceed as in the following:
1) If a contact with the abuse role exists:
1.a) If at least one pref parameter exists, I would return only the most
preferred email address;
1.b) If the pref parameter is missing, I would return all the email addresses
in order of appearance.
2) If a contact with the abuse role is missing, I would return no abuse email
address
Hope It could be helpful.
Yup, that's an applicable hint. I'd suggest to publish it as a default profile
in the next RFC. (I don't know how to get profiles, let alone parsing them.
Having a default profile allows to make sense of APNIC's preferences.)
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
