> -----Original Message----- > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Monday, February 14, 2022 1:54 PM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] RDAP preference on abuse reporting > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content > is safe. > > Hi, > dunno if this is the right place to ask... > > I wrote a small utility to get abuse address(es) via RDAP.[*] Today someone > told me that APNIC only has one abuse address, the other address in the > same vcardArray is not supposed to be used for abuse reporting. The > addresses can be discriminated by one having pref=1 and the other no pref. > AFAIK, pref is described in Section 5.3 of RFC 6530. However, it is still > not > very clear how to use it in this particular case. Which of the following is > better for abuse > reporting: > > * When email addresses are ordered by preference use only the most > preferred, > > * When email addresses are ordered by preference use all except the least > preferred, or > > * When email addresses are ordered by preference use the upper half of > them. > > > Note that the result is the same in the APNIC case.
[SAH] Could you show us the JSON data structure that you're referring to? That'll better help us understand the RDAP response. Section 5.3 of RFC 6350 doesn't say anything about using only the most-preferred address(es). My suggestion with respect to 6350 is that you should start with the most preferred address, use the next one if that doesn't work, and so on. That suggestion might change depending on what we see in the RDAP response. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
