Hi Tobias, inline
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:22 AM Tobias Sattler <satt...@united-domains.de> wrote: > Thanks, Joseph. > > Please see our comments inline. > > Tobias > > On 11. Apr 2021, at 18:25, Joseph Yee <j...@afilias.info> wrote: > > Hi Antoin and everyone, > > I reviewed the -12 draft and support the publication. > > Two (very) minor changes suggested: > > (1) > Section 3.3 > <maint:detail> > The OPTIONAL URI to detailed maintenance description. > > It's clear what URI is, but should still need to reference it with the > according RFCs. > > > TS: We will add the reference. > > > (2) > Section 5.1 > The formal syntax for <maint:id> should include the attribute > specification for 'name' and 'lang'. > > > TS: Can you please clarify that? We have “name” and “lang” for <maint:id>. > > <complexType name="infoType"> > <sequence> > <choice> > <element name="list"/> > <element name="id" type="maint:idType"/> > </choice> > </sequence> > </complexType> > <!-- > Human-readable text may describe the maintenance > --> > <complexType name="idType"> > <simpleContent> > <extension base="token"> > <attribute name="name" type="token"/> > <attribute name="lang" type="language" default="en"/> > </extension> > </simpleContent> > </complexType> > > Yes, re-read the draft and it's there. I missed it when I wrote my comment. Thanks, Joseph > Best, > Joseph > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:21 AM Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl> wrote: > >> Just to be clear, since this is a 2nd WGLC, the new WGLC is for >> draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12 >> >> >> >> > Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl> het >> volgende geschreven: >> > >> > The following working group document is believed to be ready for >> submission to the IESG for publication as a standards track document: >> > >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/ >> > >> > EXTRA ATTENTION: This is the second WGLC for this document. During the >> first WGLC, there were still some substantial comments to be addressed, and >> there was not enough positive feedback to declare consensus on this >> document. Let’s do better this time and please take the time to review this >> document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is sufficient) or >> concerns with the publication of this document by replying to this message >> on the list. Since we have 3 authors, we need more reviewers to state >> support! >> > >> > This WG last call will end at close of business, Monday, 12 April 2021. >> > >> > >> > The document shepherd for this document is James Galvin. >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Antoin and Jim >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > regext mailing list >> > regext@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext >> >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list >> regext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext >> > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
