Thanks, Joseph.

Please see our comments inline.

Tobias

> On 11. Apr 2021, at 18:25, Joseph Yee <j...@afilias.info> wrote:
> 
> Hi Antoin and everyone,
> 
> I reviewed the -12 draft and support the publication.
> 
> Two (very) minor changes suggested:
> 
> (1)
> Section 3.3 
> <maint:detail>
> The OPTIONAL URI to detailed maintenance description.
> 
> It's clear what URI is, but should still need to reference it with the 
> according RFCs.

TS: We will add the reference.

> 
> (2)
> Section 5.1
> The formal syntax for <maint:id> should include the attribute specification 
> for 'name' and 'lang'.

TS: Can you please clarify that? We have “name” and “lang” for <maint:id>.

<complexType name="infoType">
       <sequence>
         <choice>
           <element name="list"/>
           <element name="id" type="maint:idType"/>
         </choice>
       </sequence>
     </complexType>
     <!--
     Human-readable text may describe the maintenance
     -->
     <complexType name="idType">
       <simpleContent>
         <extension base="token">
           <attribute name="name" type="token"/>
           <attribute name="lang" type="language" default="en"/>
         </extension>
       </simpleContent>
     </complexType>

> 
> Best,
> Joseph
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 9:21 AM Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl 
> <mailto:i...@antoin.nl>> wrote:
> Just to be clear, since this is a 2nd WGLC, the new WGLC is for 
> draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-12
> 
> 
> 
> > Op 29 mrt. 2021, om 14:49 heeft Antoin Verschuren <i...@antoin.nl 
> > <mailto:i...@antoin.nl>> het volgende geschreven:
> > 
> > The following working group document is believed to be ready for submission 
> > to the IESG for publication as a standards track document:
> > 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/
> >  
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance/>
> > 
> > EXTRA ATTENTION: This is the second WGLC for this document. During the 
> > first WGLC, there were still some substantial comments to be addressed, and 
> > there was not enough positive feedback to declare consensus on this 
> > document. Let’s do better this time and please take the time to review this 
> > document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is sufficient) or 
> > concerns with the publication of this document by replying to this message 
> > on the list. Since we have 3 authors, we need more reviewers to state 
> > support!
> > 
> > This WG last call will end at close of business, Monday, 12 April 2021.
> > 
> > 
> > The document shepherd for this document is James Galvin.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Antoin and Jim
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > regext mailing list
> > regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext 
> > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext>
> _______________________________________________
> regext mailing list
> regext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to