Count me in. Tim
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:14 AM Alexander Mayrhofer < alex.mayrhofer.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've reserved room PARIS on wednesday, 2pm for that discussion. I hope > that everyone can make it - this is the "unstructured time" slot on > Wed afternoon, and so far it does not collide with any BoFs.. If > there's a more convenient time, please let me know in private mail... > i thought a doodle would be overkill for now.. > > best, > Alex > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:46 PM Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > > > Rubens Kuhl <rube...@nic.br> wrote: > > > > > > I imagine that DNS as a communication channel to assure registrant > > > willingness to change something, similar to CDNS/CDNSKEY, could be > quite > > > useful. For instance, if the name servers that are delegated on the > > > registry are now pointing to new name servers, and this response is > > > signed by the current DS/DNSKEY on the delegation, changing the DNS > > > servers for that domain is pretty safe. > > > > There is RFC 7477 CSYNC, but I don't know of any implementations. > > > > Tony. > > -- > > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ > > safeguard the balance of nature and the environment > > > > _______________________________________________ > > regext mailing list > > regext@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
