I've reserved room PARIS on wednesday, 2pm for that discussion. I hope that everyone can make it - this is the "unstructured time" slot on Wed afternoon, and so far it does not collide with any BoFs.. If there's a more convenient time, please let me know in private mail... i thought a doodle would be overkill for now..
best, Alex On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:46 PM Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > Rubens Kuhl <rube...@nic.br> wrote: > > > > I imagine that DNS as a communication channel to assure registrant > > willingness to change something, similar to CDNS/CDNSKEY, could be quite > > useful. For instance, if the name servers that are delegated on the > > registry are now pointing to new name servers, and this response is > > signed by the current DS/DNSKEY on the delegation, changing the DNS > > servers for that domain is pretty safe. > > There is RFC 7477 CSYNC, but I don't know of any implementations. > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ > safeguard the balance of nature and the environment > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
