Rubens Kuhl <rube...@nic.br> wrote: > > I imagine that DNS as a communication channel to assure registrant > willingness to change something, similar to CDNS/CDNSKEY, could be quite > useful. For instance, if the name servers that are delegated on the > registry are now pointing to new name servers, and this response is > signed by the current DS/DNSKEY on the delegation, changing the DNS > servers for that domain is pretty safe.
There is RFC 7477 CSYNC, but I don't know of any implementations. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ safeguard the balance of nature and the environment _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
