Hi Andy,
Il 25/01/2019 16:02, Andy Newton ha scritto:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:12:19AM +0530, Gurshabad Grover wrote:
On 23/01/19 6:25 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
[...]
In this draft, there are no privacy considerations, and the report that is
being cited to legitimize this approach has not been adopted by ICANN the
organization or the community and was very controversial at the time of
publication. The report is being miscited as being produced by ICANN itself,
which was not the case.
[...]
I agree with Niels:
* Since the document starts with outlining privacy concerns as being of
primary import and relevance to the discussion around reverse search,
the document would naturally benefit from adding privacy considerations.
* The reference to a ICANN WG's recommendations as "... ICANN itself, in
its report about Next-Gen Registration Directory Service (RDS) ..." is
also problematic.
Thank you.
Gurshabad
If the authors removed this introductory text, would you drop your objections?
I'm removing that text from the new version as well as I'm adding a
"Privacy Consideration" section.
Regards,
mario
-andy
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
--
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Servizi Internet e Sviluppo Tecnologico
CNR - Istituto di Informatica e Telematica
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
E-Mail: mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it
Phone: +39.0503153497
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
