On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:12:19AM +0530, Gurshabad Grover wrote: > On 23/01/19 6:25 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote: > > [...] > > In this draft, there are no privacy considerations, and the report that is > > being cited to legitimize this approach has not been adopted by ICANN the > > organization or the community and was very controversial at the time of > > publication. The report is being miscited as being produced by ICANN > > itself, which was not the case. > > [...] > > I agree with Niels: > > * Since the document starts with outlining privacy concerns as being of > primary import and relevance to the discussion around reverse search, > the document would naturally benefit from adding privacy considerations. > > * The reference to a ICANN WG's recommendations as "... ICANN itself, in > its report about Next-Gen Registration Directory Service (RDS) ..." is > also problematic. > > Thank you. > Gurshabad
If the authors removed this introductory text, would you drop your objections? -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
