On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Mario Loffredo <mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it> wrote: > Does the proposed set of rules validate an RDAP response permissively? > I mean, do those rules validate successfully a response with extra fields?
Yes. That's how RDAP is specified. JCR allows this by default, but can be written to be strict. > > If yes, it seems to me that the help_response rule validates almost > everything (except the basic error response). Since a /help is a subset of everything else, it could be read that way. The rules in the draft are written as permissive but it is possible to write them more strictly. That being said, I don't think that is the right approach for RDAP. The thought has always been to ignore what you didn't expect. There are already extensions which add RDAP specified structures to other RDAP responses (see my subnets draft). Restricting things makes RDAP extensions much more difficult. > I don't know if it is an error in JCR, it would be if root rules are > mutually exclusive. At present, they are not. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
