I agree with Scott.

Mario

Il 26/09/2017 14:31, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:

Here’s a thought: identify the milestone documents for which there has been no discussion, no progress, and no requests for meeting time slots. Schedule meeting time to talk about removing them as milestones so we can make room for other documents.

Scott

*From:* regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Antoin Verschuren
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:14 AM
*To:* Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

Hi all,

So far, we only had one reply from Roger for agenda items.

With one of the items for a working session being discussed in an Interim meeting before IETF100, this seems like we will not have enough topics to justify a full working session during IETF100.

This feels a bit contradictory to the desire to have a seperate working session.

We will probably opt for one longer update session where the additional time will be dedicated to working items.

Any thoughts? Any more agenda items?

Jim and Antoin

- -- Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392

Op 20 sep. 2017, om 17:55 heeft Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com <mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>> het volgende geschreven:



    Good Morning,

    I would like to suggest the following agenda items for the working
    session:

      * The Validate draft
      * Registry Mapping and Launch Phase Listing

    And for updates:

      * Fee
      * Validate
      * Interim Meetings

    Thanks

    Roger

    -----Original Message-----
    From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin
    Verschuren
    Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 8:30 AM
    To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org
    <mailto:regext@ietf.org>>
    Subject: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100

    Dear Working group,

    It’s time to start planning for IETF 100 in Singapore.

    To be able to judge if we need a working session, we have 2
    questions for you

    1. Please submit agenda items to the list.

    2. Please indicate if you need working time or update time for
    your item.

    Since we need to request meeting slots within a fortnight please
    submit your discussion items before friday 22th so we can discuss if:

    1. We can discuss items in a interim meeting before IETF 100 and
    only need 1 update session.

    2. We need both a working session and a short update session for
    IETF 100.

    3. Or we can do with one longer joint working/update session.

    Thanx,

    Jim and Antoin

    - --

    Antoin Verschuren

    Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL

    M: +31 6 37682392

    _______________________________________________
    regext mailing list
    regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext



_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext


--
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Servizi Internet e Sviluppo Tecnologico
CNR - Istituto di Informatica e Telematica
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
E-Mail: mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it
Phone: +39 050 3153497
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to