I agree with Scott.
Mario
Il 26/09/2017 14:31, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
Here’s a thought: identify the milestone documents for which there has
been no discussion, no progress, and no requests for meeting time
slots. Schedule meeting time to talk about removing them as milestones
so we can make room for other documents.
Scott
*From:* regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Antoin
Verschuren
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:14 AM
*To:* Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org>
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100
Hi all,
So far, we only had one reply from Roger for agenda items.
With one of the items for a working session being discussed in an
Interim meeting before IETF100, this seems like we will not have
enough topics to justify a full working session during IETF100.
This feels a bit contradictory to the desire to have a seperate
working session.
We will probably opt for one longer update session where the
additional time will be dedicated to working items.
Any thoughts? Any more agenda items?
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
Op 20 sep. 2017, om 17:55 heeft Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com
<mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>> het volgende geschreven:
Good Morning,
I would like to suggest the following agenda items for the working
session:
* The Validate draft
* Registry Mapping and Launch Phase Listing
And for updates:
* Fee
* Validate
* Interim Meetings
Thanks
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin
Verschuren
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 8:30 AM
To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org
<mailto:regext@ietf.org>>
Subject: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100
Dear Working group,
It’s time to start planning for IETF 100 in Singapore.
To be able to judge if we need a working session, we have 2
questions for you
1. Please submit agenda items to the list.
2. Please indicate if you need working time or update time for
your item.
Since we need to request meeting slots within a fortnight please
submit your discussion items before friday 22th so we can discuss if:
1. We can discuss items in a interim meeting before IETF 100 and
only need 1 update session.
2. We need both a working session and a short update session for
IETF 100.
3. Or we can do with one longer joint working/update session.
Thanx,
Jim and Antoin
- --
Antoin Verschuren
Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org <mailto:regext@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
--
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Servizi Internet e Sviluppo Tecnologico
CNR - Istituto di Informatica e Telematica
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
E-Mail: mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it
Phone: +39 050 3153497
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext