Here's a thought: identify the milestone documents for which there has been no discussion, no progress, and no requests for meeting time slots. Schedule meeting time to talk about removing them as milestones so we can make room for other documents.
Scott From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:14 AM To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100 Hi all, So far, we only had one reply from Roger for agenda items. With one of the items for a working session being discussed in an Interim meeting before IETF100, this seems like we will not have enough topics to justify a full working session during IETF100. This feels a bit contradictory to the desire to have a seperate working session. We will probably opt for one longer update session where the additional time will be dedicated to working items. Any thoughts? Any more agenda items? Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 20 sep. 2017, om 17:55 heeft Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com<mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>> het volgende geschreven: Good Morning, I would like to suggest the following agenda items for the working session: * The Validate draft * Registry Mapping and Launch Phase Listing And for updates: * Fee * Validate * Interim Meetings Thanks Roger -----Original Message----- From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 8:30 AM To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>> Subject: [regext] Preparing for IETF 100 Dear Working group, It's time to start planning for IETF 100 in Singapore. To be able to judge if we need a working session, we have 2 questions for you 1. Please submit agenda items to the list. 2. Please indicate if you need working time or update time for your item. Since we need to request meeting slots within a fortnight please submit your discussion items before friday 22th so we can discuss if: 1. We can discuss items in a interim meeting before IETF 100 and only need 1 update session. 2. We need both a working session and a short update session for IETF 100. 3. Or we can do with one longer joint working/update session. Thanx, Jim and Antoin - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
