> Em 22 de set de 2016, à(s) 15:46:000, Francisco Arias > <francisco.ar...@icann.org> escreveu: > > I think there are two parts to your question. First, the Registry Stakeholder > Group (RySG) request for reconsideration that triggered this proposal; > perhaps someone else in this list (from the RySG) can speak to that. > > The second part would be ICANN organization’s proposal to address the RySG > request. ICANN is putting for the community’s consideration to do as > requested by the RySG and remove the requirement to implement RDAP. We are > looking to learn what other members from the community have to say.
Francisco, I think that saying "remove the requirement RDAP at this point with this guidance" would better describe what's being asked. RDAP is already a contract requirement that can be triggered any time without a policy. Rubens _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
