On 13 September 2017 at 01:17, Francisco Arias <francisco.ar...@icann.org> wrote: > Thank you for the suggestion, Bernhard. We'll take it into consider if the > document is revived, as you said. > > -- > Francisco > > On 9/12/17, 2:00 AM, "Bernhard Reutner-Fischer" <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote:
> The "RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars" > version 1.0 Document erroneously talks about "publicIDs" (as opposed > to "publicIds" specified in RFC 7483). > Please fix if the operational profile ever gets revived. > In general the profile could need a touch-up, IMHO. Further notes i took. 1.4.10. An RDAP response MUST contain a remarks member with a description containing the string "This response conforms to the RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars version 1.0". Since remarks are only allowed in objects classes and /help is not an object this requirement should mention "object response" somewhere as otherwise it would be in violation with the RFC. 1.5.20. A domain name RDAP response MUST contain a remarks member with a title "Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form", a description containing the string "URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf"; and a links member with the https://www.icann.org/wicf URL. Drop the "www." part of the URL to be consistent with 1.5.18 (the "https://icann.org/epp"; URL) thanks, _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
