Bret Hughes wrote:
> Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Philip D. Jenkins wrote:
> >
> > > Why is bash version 1 the default bash shell and not bash version 2?
> >
> > Because you're using an obsolete version of Red Hat Linux.
>
> I have to take exception to the use of the word obsolete here. I have no
> heard anything that leads me to believe that RedHat 6.2 is the latest stable
> release that should be used in a production server environment. Now if he
> had asked a question about 5.2 then I would have to agree but 6.2 obsolete?
> Not hardly. Perhaps no the latest and "greatest" but with all the errata
> updates extremely solid and secure. How can that be obsolete?
>
> Bret
I really should not write when I am in a hurry. The second sentence should
have read:
I have not heard anything that leads me to believe that RedHat 6.2 isn't the
latest stable
release that should be used in a production server environment.
Still a really poor sentence but at least it says what I was thinking :)
Bret
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
