Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Philip D. Jenkins wrote: > > > Why is bash version 1 the default bash shell and not bash version 2? > > Because you're using an obsolete version of Red Hat Linux. Older, not obsolete. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Why bash1 and not bash2? Philip D. Jenkins
- Re: Why bash1 and not bash2? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Why bash1 and not bash2? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Why bash1 and not bash2? Bret Hughes
- Re: Why bash1 and not bash2? Nitebirdz
- Re: Why bash1 and not bash2? Bret Hughes
- RE: Why bash1 and not bash2? Manuel A. Camacho Q.
- RE: Why bash1 and not bash2? John Aldrich
- Re: Why bash1 and not bash2? Thomas Ribbrock
- Re: Why bash1 and not bash2? Dave Ihnat
- a page of version changes for administrato... Kyle Hargraves