On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote: > > Whether that 'you' was meant for Stephen or 'everyone'. If you are saying > this is universally true, I am saying that I am an exception to your > statement, as I have never seen this behavior in 7.0 or previously. > Other than that, I don't really care. If and when I have problems, I > will switch clients. Until then it just quietly works for me. > Ain't linux wonderful? You've got your choice of clients for this. If one works, fine... use it. If it doesn't, use the alternative. :-) John _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steve Borho
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.0 Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.0 Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted o... Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is bus... John Aldrich
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... John Aldrich
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is bus... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Jerry Winegarden