On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 01:38:33PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > > At this point, we've pretty much confirmed that if you are running > pump, the interface is going to die after some period of time which > seems pretty close to the lease renewal time. Since switching that 7.0 > system over to dhcpcd (by removing pump) the interface has not gone down > once. I'm convinced... > Who is 'you'? Is this a royal 'you' or are you <g> referring to Stephen? Pump 7.0v is running fine here for two weeks on a 12 hr lease. Not even a hiccup. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Cokey de Percin
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Charles Galpin
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steve Borho
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.0 Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.0 Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted on 7.... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is busted o... Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is bus... John Aldrich
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... John Aldrich
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is bus... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd - pump is... Jerry Winegarden