On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 02:31:31PM -0500, Dave Reed wrote: [...] > Ok. I thought there would be compatibility problems since they're > compiled against different version of glibc, but maybe not. I won't > clutter the list with any more replies. Just as an additional option: Often it is sufficient to grab the SRPM and do a rebuild to get an RPM for a newer RHL version working on an older one. Cheerio, Thomas -- "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!" Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919 "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01] ircii buffer overflow
Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\) Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:27:30 -0800
- [RHSA-2000:008-01] ircii buffer overflow Dave Reed
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01] ircii buffer ov... David D.W. Downey
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01] ircii buffe... Dave Reed
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01] ircii b... Jasper Jans
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01] irc... Dave Reed
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01] ircii b... David D.W. Downey
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01] ircii b... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01] irc... Dave Reed
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01... Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\)
- Re: [RHSA-2000:008-01... Gordon Messmer