On Sat, 13 Nov 1999, Hal Burgiss said:

HB>On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 03:37:58AM -0500, Chuck Mead wrote:
HB>> On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, David S Edwards said:
HB>> 
HB>> DSE>Sorry I didn't include that.  Here is line 178 and the couple preceding 
HB>> DSE>it.  I don't know much about rpm spec files, so I have no idea what's 
HB>> DSE>wrong, and I couldn't get to bugzilla at RH today.
HB>> DSE>
HB>> DSE>175    %package smp
HB>> DSE>176    Summary: The Linux kernel compiled for SMP machines.
HB>> DSE>177    Group: System Environment/Kernel
HB>> DSE>178    Provides: kernel = %{version}
HB>>                               ^ this is a variable. The value of %{version}
HB>> should have been set earlier in the spec file. Probably near the top. I see
HB>> you're calling the spec file kernel-2.2.13.spec. If you're rewriting this to
HB>> build the 2.2.13 kernel you have the advantage of me as you haven't told us
HB>> that yet. Also... if you're serious about building rpm's and learning the
HB>> ropes why not join the rpm list. I learned a lot over there during the last
HB>> couple of years and I still do.
HB>> 
HB>
HB>The spec file that comes with 6.1 is labeled 2.2.13 for whatever
HB>reason.

I can think of a couple.... :-)

-- 
Chuck Mead, CTO, MoonGroup Consulting, Inc. <http://moongroup.com> 
Mail problems? Send "s-u-b-s-c-r-i-b-e mailhelp" (no quotes and no
hyphens) in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public key available at: wwwkeys.us.pgp.net                              


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to