OK thanks again. Darn Decaf.
Quoting Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Coffee must not have kicked in when, on Thu, 3 Apr 2003, I wrote: > > > Sorry, I don't know where to find P4 binaries of 2.95.x. I also > don't > > know if 2.95.x will compile for the P4. > > Of course, i386 and i686 binaries will run fine on a P4, though > perhaps > marginally slower that if they were P4 optimized. And the i386 and > i686 > code that gcc produces will run just fine on a P4 too, but I don't > know if > 2.95.x can optimize specifically for P4. On the other hand, I don't > know > that gcc 3.2's P4 optimization is all that special yet, either. > I've > heard it suggested that it has a way to go. > > Don't know what I could have been thinking. > -- > Matthew Saltzman > > Clemson University Math Sciences > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
