On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Andrew Burton wrote:
> _Internally_, sure it was. From a users or administrative position
> (after the initial install/config), not in the least. And that's a
> sign that RedHat did a good job with the conversion.
>
>
> On 23 Apr 98, Derek Balling wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Marco Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not looking for trouble here....but I didn't see much difference between
> > > 4.2 to 5, so I don't expect much of a difference from 5 to 5.1. I was the
> > > one that brought up this subject last week...out of curiosity...and being a
> > > little bored.
> >
> > What?!! You didn't think the whole conversion to glibc was "much
> > difference"?????
I've got a nicely humming, heavily modified RedHat 4.2 with a 2.1.96 SMP
kernel. I want to use glibc for development, and so far no-one has
provided any tips on how to install glibc on a RedHat 4.2 system without
having to upgrade to 5.0. Unfortunately from what I've read on this
mailing list, the upgrade from 4.2 -> 5.0 is far from painless. I hope
RedHat will improve the upgrade process from 4.x systems, since I really
don't want any significant downtimes due to some stupidities in the
upgrade process.
Any comments on this from the people in the know?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Imrisek "I've done . . . questionable things.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nothing the God of biomechanics
wouldn't let you into heaven for."
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
