>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 00:44:58 2001
X-Delivered: at request of mail on mail5
Received: from listman.redhat.com (listman.redhat.com [199.183.24.211])
        by kr.qrio.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA26319
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:44:54 +0900
Received: from listman.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id CFC5C2FF32; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:55:04 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239])
        by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2532F934
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:54:01 -0500 
(EST)
Received: (from mail@localhost)
        by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f1FFsPs24450
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:54:25 -0500
Received: from photon.sph.unc.edu (photon.sph.unc.edu [152.2.110.45])
        by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f1FFsPd24444
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:54:25 -0500
Received: from eh3.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by photon.sph.unc.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1FFrco06884
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:53:38 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:53:38 -0500
From: Ed Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test9 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RAD tool from Borland
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta4
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Red Hat developer's list <redhat-devel-list.redhat.com>
Cc:
Bcc:


Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> > Have you checked the price if Windows tools?
> > Look at Delphi, C++ Builder, or any MS Visual *
> > product. Klyix is on par with the Professional versions
> > of those tools, and priced better.

(*snip*)

> They are introducing a product into a community accostomed to not only
> getting quality development tools for free, but getting the source code to
> boot.
>
> They need to remember that the majority of their potential customers are
> using Emacs, vi, or other free development environments and they need to
> offer both a compelling and competitive feature set as well as a
> competitve price. They also need to remember that Linux has a very strong
> appeal to people with limited budgets: students, startups, intependent
> contractors and consultants.

Having recently attended a Delphi Users Group meeting, I'll
wager that current Linux users are only a fraction of Kylix's
potential market.  There are *plenty* of Delphi developers out
there now who see Kylix as an entry point to Linux coding.


> I don't want Borland to pull out of the market after 6 months, as have
> Corel and Adobe done, blaming us in the Linux community because they can't
> figure out a product strategy and pricing model that appeal to us. The one
> good thing, though, is that if Borland fails, it is clear that open source
> alternatives like Glade will grow to fill the void.

True.  I hope they succeed and, in the process, pull in a lot
of Delphi coders.

Ed

--
//  Ed Hill               _____   _  _  ___      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
//  UNC-CH DESE           //_    //_//   _))    V: (919) 966-6332
//  104 Rosenau Hall     //___  // //   __))    F: (919) 966-7911
//  Chapel Hill, NC  27599-7400              <http://www.eh3.com>



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list





_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Reply via email to