> How about with the 2.3.99pre kernels? > > (I don't have the offending card, but I'd like to clear the air) Since the driver just got a major update - I dont know. The goal is certainly to be totally 2.95 friendly -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... JF Martinez
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... Alan Shutko
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... Alan Shutko
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... Alan Shutko
- RE: Why no i586/i686 suppo... Joseph Malicki
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... Alan Cox
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... John Summerfield
- Re: Why no i586/i686 suppo... Alan Cox
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Thomas Dodd
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Julie
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Chris Abbey
- Scripting Spawn
- Re: Why no i586/i686 support? Steven Boswell