> > They won't do it. For many reasons, including the fact that it would > no longer actually be redhat 6.1 - but a new version. I think you're right that RHS won't. It used to, though, but it confused some poor helpless users. I personally see no problem with 6.1.1, 6.1.2 etc being rebuilt version with updated RPMs in place, being put together as fresh supplies are needed I expect republishers will create new CDs. -- Cheers John Summerfield http://os2.ami.com.au/os2/ for OS/2 support. Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index. -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Tom Diehl
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Matt Nelson
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Stanislav Meduna
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Alan Cox
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Matt Nelson
- Re: updated redhat distribu... John Summerfield
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Alan Cox
- Re: updated redhat distribu... Nils Philippsen
- Re: updated redhat distribu... John Summerfield
- File this Henry J. Cobb
- Re: updated redhat distribu... John Summerfield
- Re: updated redhat distribu... JF Martinez
- Re: a workaround for upgrad... JF Martinez
- Re: More 6.1 Upgrades Woes Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: More 6.1 Upgrades Woes John Summerfield
- How to lose partitions with RH 6.1: a Mini-HOWTO Rod May
- Re: How to lose partitions with RH 6.1: a Mini-H... Chuck Mead
- Re: How to lose partitions with RH 6.1: a Mi... Tom Diehl
- installation type & package choice s... Tony Nugent
- Re: installation type & package ... Hal Burgiss
- Re: installation type & package ... John Summerfield