On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 02:26:20PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > It can -- but it isn't the solution, just a workaround for the U.S. > censorship. The real solution would let RedHat ship it on their CDs. > GnuPG (not GnuPGP) is in a lot better position, though -- it's produced > outside the U.S., and is still legal (no patent issues) within the U.S., > so one program can be used anywhere. So now, for the good news. Beginning with Red Hat Linux 6.1, all our packages are GPG signed. Red Hat Linux purchased in the US includes GPG, mutt with GPG hooks, a GUI frontend to GPG (called gpgp), and the 128 bit crypto version of Netscape Communicator. Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy ? Joerg Mertin
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy ? Simon Epsteyn
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy ? Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... Benno Senoner
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy ? rsk
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... Damien Miller
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating po... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updatin... Benno Senoner
- Re: future Redhat security-patches upd... Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat security-patche... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... Matt Wilson
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... John Summerfield
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... Bill Nottingham
- Update Agent Riyad Kalla
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... Edward S. Marshall
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... Alan Cox
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... JF Martinez