Damien Miller wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 2 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Mandrake currently has something similar to this. Its a very very
> > nice feature. It will poll mirrors close to you for updates, and you
> > can install them right from the list that pops up. It reminds me
> > a bit of WindowsUpdate, minus the rebooting :) Although I haven't
> > messed with Mandrake all that much so I can't vouch for all its
> > pros/cons.
>
> The problem is that Microsoft can cryptographically sign their
> packages whereas Redhat cannot (unless they use a NSA certified,
> closed-source system to do it).
>
> Digital signatures are essential for any live update system like
> this.
>
Actually, RedHat can, and do, sign their packages. They just can't
distribute the software you need to verify the signatures; you have to
download it yourself...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- future Redhat security-patches updating policy ? Benno Senoner
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... Joerg Mertin
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... Simon Epsteyn
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating po... Benno Senoner
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... rsk
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating po... Damien Miller
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updatin... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: future Redhat security-patches upd... Benno Senoner
- Re: future Redhat security-patche... Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: future Redhat securit... Matt Wilson
- Re: future Redhat securit... Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat securit... John Summerfield
- Re: future Redhat securit... Bill Nottingham
- Update Agent Riyad Kalla
- Re: future Redhat securit... Edward S. Marshall
- Re: future Redhat securit... Alan Cox
