>sorry for my ignorance, but aren't PGP signatures included in every RPM ? >I think when you are installing the rpm the rpm verifies the signature. every RPM *can* be PGP signed... not all are. rpm *can* verify the signature of a signed RPM, *IFF* you have pgp installed, and ask it to do so. Redhat does not ship PGP; that's what hpa meant by having to download it yourself. >I am missing something ? > >Is GnuPG the solution of the US export-control problems ? You mean GnuPGP? if it can be obtained outside the US, and it can perform the same level of verification as pgp can inside the US, then yeah I don't see why not. cabbey at home dot net <*> http://members.home.net/cabbey I want a binary interface to the brain! Today's opto-mechanical digital interfaces are just too slow! -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- future Redhat security-patches updating policy ? Benno Senoner
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... Joerg Mertin
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... Simon Epsteyn
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating po... Benno Senoner
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating policy... rsk
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updating po... Damien Miller
- Re: future Redhat security-patches updatin... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: future Redhat security-patches upd... Benno Senoner
- Re: future Redhat security-patche... Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat security-pa... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: future Redhat securit... Matt Wilson
- Re: future Redhat securit... Chris Abbey
- Re: future Redhat securit... John Summerfield
- Re: future Redhat securit... Bill Nottingham
- Update Agent Riyad Kalla
- Re: future Redhat securit... Edward S. Marshall
- Re: future Redhat securit... Alan Cox
- Re: future Redhat securit... JF Martinez