Jason:


Thanks for the follow-up.  Two thoughts:



1.   I agree that a PV problem should not cause a system shutdown.  I seem
to recall Sol-Arc said they can’t do anything to correct the issue due to
listing/testing issues.  This alone would prevent me from choosing
Sol-Arc.  There is a lot of design history that goes against the all-in-one
approach.  For example, I remember as a teenager I got interested in stereo
equipment.  The logic was developing that rather than having a console
stereo, separate components offered more flexibility and reliability:  More
flexible because you weren’t stuck with a given collection of components
and more reliable because if one component failed, you had less to repair
or replace.  The same logic also applies to the one big inverter versus
several small inverters discussion.

2.   You mentioned you had bypass capabilities but no person to activate
it.  I’ve had this idea for a while:  If one has a generator as part of a
battery/inverter system, and reliability is critical--why not add an
Automatic Transfer switch right before the loads with the inverter as the
normal input and the generator as the emergency input?  The generator still
feeds the inverter system for normal operation, but if the inverter system
errors out, the ATS can start the generator and activate the bypass-- all
unattended.

William



Miller Solar

17395 Oak Road, Atascadero, CA 93422

805-438-5600

www.millersolar.com

CA Lic. 773985





*From:* RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] *On
Behalf Of *Jason Szumlanski via RE-wrenches
*Sent:* Monday, October 14, 2024 8:19 PM
*To:* Maverick Brown
*Cc:* Jason Szumlanski; RE-wrenches
*Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] All-In-Ones / Sol-Ark fail



Diagnosis: No broken panels. Two different issues. We found a broken MC4
connector, possibly due to flying debris. We also found a melted Polaris
tap that got wet (long story, our fault).



These two issues happened at seeming the exact same time during the
hurricane, but were completely different events. The next morning it caused
faults on two of four inverters when the sun came up, and the other two
inverters faulted out as "parallel faults." That's a behavior that seems
unacceptable. Neither of the initially faulted inverters were the master,
either.



One bad PV string on one out of four inverters should not cause a total
system failure to operate.



Jason





On Fri, Oct 11, 2024, 3:59 PM Jason Szumlanski <
ja...@floridasolardesigngroup.com> wrote:

That is the exact error! But I don't think that explains how I have one
string over the expected voltage and one string under. It's definitely
worth checking, nonetheless. This array is 12 feet in the air and pitched
at 5 degrees, so you can't see the glass from the ground.



It is conceivable that I have two issues. The voltage issue could be a
wiring issue and the inverters may have faulted out due to broken modules.
There were tropical force winds there at the time.


Jason Szumlanski

Principal Solar Designer | Florida Solar Design Group
NABCEP Certified Solar Professional (PVIP)
Florida State Certified Solar Contractor CVC56956

Florida Certified Electrical Contractor EC13013208





On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 3:49 PM Maverick Brown <maver...@mavericksolar.com>
wrote:

Jason



Which fault are you getting?



This spring I was getting F23-Tz_GFCLO randomly on an upper roof array.



After further investigation, I found several modules with broken glass.
After replacing the mods, all is well.



Thank you,



Maverick



Maverick Brown
Off-Grid Solar Commander since 2006
Maverick Solar Enterprises, Inc.
 • Solar Commander Remote Power
 • SunFlow Systems Cathodic Protection
maver...@mavericksolar.com
512-460-9825







On Oct 11, 2024, at 1:39 PM, Jason Szumlanski via RE-wrenches <
re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> wrote:



By shutting off the PV disconnects on the two affected inverters we were
able to make the system work successfully today. As I mentioned, we will
dig into the actual faults on Monday. From the historical data, I found
that this issue has actually been going on for a week before the faults
started happening in the inverters. I'm not sure why the faults took so
long to cause a shutdown of the inverters. Maybe it just "got worse" and
finally triggered a fault. The first faults would have been  during the
early band of rain from Hurricane Milton, so possibly water or wind put the
issue over the top.



Before the shutdown, each of the two affected inverters had one MPPT with
voltages out of the expected range for the last week.



All MPPT strings are 14 modules with 7 in series, 2 in parallel. Each
string Voc is 342V and Vmp is 297V.



On the first affected inverter, I was able to observe the bad string
operating consistently around 370V to 400V+, which is obviously well above
the Voc (and it's hot here in Florida). The good string on this inverter
operated around 260-270V during the same time, which is the expected range.



On the second affected inverter, I observed the bad string operating
consistently around 100V to 130V+. The good string on this inverter
operated around 260-270V during the same time, which again is the expected
range.



Graphs are attached for those of you who like that kind of stuff. These
show a typical day after the issue started to occur, but before the
inverter faults occurred.



Incidentally, the average voltage of the two bad strings seems to be pretty
close to the normal strings, so that is a good clue.


Jason Szumlanski

Principal Solar Designer | Florida Solar Design Group
NABCEP Certified Solar Professional (PVIP)
Florida State Certified Solar Contractor CVC56956

Florida Certified Electrical Contractor EC13013208




*Error! Filename not specified.*

On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 6:55 AM Jason Szumlanski <
ja...@floridasolardesigngroup.com> wrote:

More interesting information... When the sun went down last night, the
fault cleared and the inverters started producing power again, drawing from
the batteries, and restarting the generator. The master inverter
"remembered" the generator was in it's charging cycle and hadn't reached
full battery yet.



It's good that the inverters started inverting again. That's a plus. I
actually wish the generator hadn't started because it was unnecessary based
on battery voltage, which was near full anyway.



Which brings me to another annoying behavior of the Sol-Arks that I
discovered in how the GEN Charge and GRID Charge parameters work with
signaling the two-wire start. If the battery voltage is 50V and the charge
parameter is set to 49V, the generator signal will not kick on of course –
the generator start relay is open. However, if you change the charge
parameter setpoint to, say 51V, the generator should start because the
battery voltage is below the setpoint. But that does not happen. The
battery voltage must "fall through" the parameter setting for the charging
to be triggered and the relay to close. If you are in a situation where you
need to get the generator on a charge cycle and then leave the site, the
only way I have found to do this is to set it to something very close to
the battery voltage, say 49.9V, put a heavy load on to drop the voltage
below the setpoint, let the generator start, then change the setpoint to
the desired 51V.





Back to the original issue – I dug into the string voltage data history
remotely and narrowed down the fault to two of the four inverters. I am
sending someone to shut down the PV DC switches on these two inverters
today in hopes that we can keep the power flowing during the day and
through the weekend. I'm planning on a Monday boat ride out there to see
what caused the fault(s). I will report back.


Jason Szumlanski

Principal Solar Designer | Florida Solar Design Group
NABCEP Certified Solar Professional (PVIP)
Florida State Certified Solar Contractor CVC56956

Florida Certified Electrical Contractor EC13013208





On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 6:00 PM Lou Russo via RE-wrenches <
re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> wrote:

Aloha All,



Thank you Jason. This is a huge and surprising issue. So much so that I
dropped what I was doing and called Sol-Ark to confirm. Mind you this was
level 1 support, but I was told this is what the Sol-Arks are supposed to
do and it is a feature not a bug. Their take is if there is any fault on
any one string, the Sol-Ark assumes the worst and shuts everything down.



I wonder what solutions could be implemented on future installs to prevent
this from happening?


Aloha,



Lou Russo

Owner

l...@spreesolarsystems.com

Office - 808 345 6762

Spree Solar Systems LLC

CT-34322







On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:45 AM Jason Szumlanski via RE-wrenches <
re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> wrote:

I think it's more likely water in a J-box or possibly physical damage, but
someone passed by the property and did not observe any physical damage to
the array.


Jason Szumlanski

Principal Solar Designer | Florida Solar Design Group
NABCEP Certified Solar Professional (PVIP)
Florida State Certified Solar Contractor CVC56956

Florida Certified Electrical Contractor EC13013208





On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 5:41 PM Jay <jay.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:

Jason

What’s the possibllity it was a lighting strike?



Jay



On Oct 10, 2024, at 2:57 PM, Jason Szumlanski via RE-wrenches <
re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> wrote:



We have been talking a lot recently about all-in-ones. I just had a massive
fail during Hurricane Milton with a quad Sol-Ark 15K off-grid system that
deserves some discussion about whether AIO is a good idea if it can't build
in some resilience to errors. I'm not sure if the new Midnite unit is
better in this respect, but this is what happened to the Sol-Ark system...



Four inverters, each with 4 strings of PV paralleled to 2 MPPT per
inverter. One of the slave units developed some sort of PV DC fault during
the storm. This caused the slave inverter to shut down and throw an error,
which in turn caused a parallel fault across all four inverters. Power
output ceases at that point. Apparently the system keeps resetting because
I have a cell modem that uploads data to Sol-Ark, but that cell modem is
powered by the inverter outputs, so it must be getting power at least
intermittently. The rest of the loads are basically flatlined according to
the Sol-Ark data. It's mostly air conditioners, so they probably can't turn
on fast enough before the PV fault causes another shutdown.



So, in essence, one of 16 strings of PV develops a fault, and that causes
all four inverters to malfunction? What is the point of redundancy if a
fault of one results in a fault of all?! If there is a true PV input fault,
shouldn't that just shut down that MPPT, or perhaps all of the PV DC input
to that inverter? And why can't this inverter continue to invert power from
the batteries and charge from a generator when there is a DC input fault
that could be programmatically isolated and ignored?



This is a bad design in my opinion, and something I hadn't considered. If
the faulted inverter can't function with a DC input fault, it should just
take itself out of the game. (This is 120/240 split phase, BTW). Is this
how all AIO inverters work? One inverter fault on the DC side kills all
paralleled units' AC output? Not good.



This is a completely off-grid system on a remote island with no vehicle
access, so it's not exactly easy to do a "truck roll" on this one,
especially post-hurricane. To make matters worse, the generator was running
at the time of the fault, as it was being signaled to run because the
battery had reached the assigned charge voltage. The fault also killed the
2-wire start signal from the master, so the system also stopped passing
through generator power to the loads. The house is dark.





Jason Szumlanski

Florida Solar Design Group



_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the
other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the
other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the
other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

<Slave 2.jpg>

<Slave 1.jpg>

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the
other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to