Jason: Be careful of drawing false comparisons. There is no free lunch. Beyond the energy yield issues there are some reliability issues.
You should also consider that running an inverter flat out all the time will shorten it's life (due to the Arrhenius effect). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrhenius_equation Think of the inverter temperature in the same way you would the power output curve (the two are closely related). Moving the whole power curve up "more on the shoulders" also moves the whole temperature curve up as well. The average lifetime (all this stuff is only probabilities) was projected with certain assumptions about how many hours at what temperature. As module sizes increase a given inverter will spend more time at a higher power level, i.e. runs hotter longer, which non-linearly reduces the life of the product. Just my $0.02... With the high labor cost of replacement it might be better to undersize the module relative to the power electronics or vice versa. This may or may not increase the installed system cost depending on the products you choose. Running everything flat out all the time is probably not the greatest idea. Best Regards, John Berdner General Manager, North America [cid:image001.jpg@01CDFD3C.B73855C0] SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 3347 Gateway Boulevard, Fremont CA 94538 USA (*Please note of our new address.) T: 510.498.3200, X 747 M: 530.277.4894 From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Jason Szumlanski Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 5:30 AM To: RE-wrenches Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] high insolation value and inverter undersizing I found the latest module "rightsizing" paper by Enphase pretty interesting. It does stand to reason that there are a lot of hours in the day where the inverter is producing less than rated power, so increasing the module size makes sense. Obviously there is an optimum point in every system where clipping exceeds gains, but that's virtually impossible to nail down due to so many factors being involved. I think the point would be that PV mods are coming down in price so much that "rightsizing" is basically equivalent to "upsizing," within reason, of course. Spending an extra 25% on PV might increase the installed system cost by 5-10%. Jason Szumlanski Fafco Solar On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Marco Mangelsdorf <ma...@pvthawaii.com<mailto:ma...@pvthawaii.com>> wrote: I have had a concern for a long time that as PV modules have gone up in output that there is inevitably going to be more and more clipping taking place as they're paired with comparatively lower output inverters. In effect, matching, say. a 260-watt module with a micro inverter with a max output of 225 watts reduces that 260-watt mod to 225 watts. It's not a matter of if clipping will take place, but how much and how much actual harvestable energy will be lost. Out here in the tropics, even in January with the lower sun angle, we see irradiance levels well above 1,000 watts/square meter range. Take a look at what I copied today from a weather station that we installed at nearby installation. Given the clipping issue inherent in using undersized inverters, it seems to me that moving to larger output micros makes a whole lotta sense. I've got one of the first installs using the Power-One 250-watt and 300-watt micros and am so far quite impressed. Why use a 225-watt rated micro with a 225-watt or higher output mod when larger micros are now readily available? What are the views out there regarding this clipping issue? Is it as minimal as our Enphase friends suggest in their latest white paper or more of an issue as I conclude? marco Environmentals from Weather Station at a Hilo, Hawaii installation Sunday, January 27th 2013, 12:40:00 pm Ambient Temp. 25.30 °C Cell Temp. 41.70 °C Insolation 127.81 kWh/m² Irradiance 1,175.00 W/m² CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and its attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity who is the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure or any type of use under applicable law. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee, agent, or representative responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply immediately to the sender. P Please think of the environment before printing this email
<<inline: image001.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
