I think those are all good points, Pete.   

When this topic popped up, it struck me that I didn't want to skew the 
conversation by talking about my own bias towards the Quickbeam design.  It 
seemed to me (and still does) that the Quickbeam/Simpleone is one of the 
great designs that Grant has come up with - containing those things which 
are needed, but little else.  Of course, in the years since that first 
announcement appeared, there have been a number of trends which have come 
and gone or arrived and stayed. It's incredibly easy to get large volume 
622/700C tires, both smooth and treaded.  Longer stays are not an outlier. 
Racks and useful bags more commonplace.   Recently swept-back bars and 
mixte-acceptability have edged into the common arena.  

So, with those facets gaining more proponents, my thought was really to see 
if any of them have become more "have-to-have" features.  With ~2500 
addresses in this group, even if EVERYONE who ever bought a 'Beam or a 'One 
is here, that means that ~2100 of them didn't.  If there's some reason why, 
other than a lack of derailleur, it would be interesting if that popped 
up.  

None of which may matter, as GP might already have ideas nailed down, lugs, 
tubes and angles spec'd.   But, I will pass trends and comments (both here 
and the private thoughts and pre-orders which folks have submitted) along 
to Grant when he has fewer things on his immediate plate.  

If the next model looks exactly like the last, it would not bother me in 
the least, but at least it won't be because I didn't ask. ;^)

all the best,

- Jim


On Sunday, December 22, 2013 12:39:41 PM UTC-8, Peter Pesce wrote:
>
> Agreed Jim.  Wouldn't it just be easier to see if there were 30 people 
> willing to pre-order an actual SO/QB? I know there's no opportunity for 
> creative expression in that, but it does seem odd to try to satisfy demand 
> for the those bikes with a new bike that will explicitly NOT be those 
> bikes!  I know GP uses "clone" in a pejorative sense but to "keep making" a 
> bike is not "cloning" it. Besides, aren't there business side advantages to 
> continuing to sell, though perhaps on a limited, pre order basis, the bike 
> for which you already amortized the tooling and development costs? 
>
> I have a last gen silver QB and love it. If it were stolen or wrecked I'd 
> seriously consider paying custom-shop money for a new one. I'm not the 
> least bit interested in a NewBeam that has the chunky tube set of my Sam, 
> double top tubes, or wavy gravy curved rear triangle bits. To me that bike 
> would have nothing in common with a QB beyond the dropouts.
>
> Pete in CT
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to