This explains my question to Ted earlier.

FWIW, in response to the poster who decried his mtb conversion
experience, I converted a nice old top-of-line Diamond Back Axis Team
into a ss all rounder with 60 mm Big Apples, fenders with air and a
~63" gear. Felt and handled wonderfully, but of course, in no way a
Rivendell. (160 mm Q btw with a custom Phil **145 mm** bb assembly! TA
Cyclotourist single.)

For me, the single most important qualities of the Rivs I've owned are
their impecable fit, feel and handling -- tho' I have reservations
about the Sam Hill. Everything else is relatively incidental.

On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:15 PM, newenglandbike <matthiasbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think one of the cool things about the QB and Simple One is the 120mm rear
> spacing combined with the relatively huge tire clearance, which AFAIK is
> pretty unique.   You can run a fairly narrow tread crank setup with a 107mm
> BB and have get a decent chainline, and yet are able to fit tires up to 45s
> on the QB, or even 50s(?) with the Simple One.     You also got the
> Rivendell geometry, lugs, rack and fenderability, build quality, etc.    All
> this is on top of those awesome 2 inch long angled dropouts.    I shift my
> QB now and then between roads and trails, and it comes in handy with for
> example 40/16, 40/19, 32/19 and 32/22 available.   It's a shame they were
> forced to discontinue them, I wish they had been more of a hit.
>
>
>
> On Sunday, April 8, 2012 8:27:37 PM UTC-4, EricP wrote:
>>
>> Well, in theory, one could have a Surly Cross Check set up for single
>> speed, and still end up ordering a SimpleOne.  In part due to longer
>> chainstays, slightly lower bottom bracket, kewl green color and being the
>> last of the completely different Rivendell models.  But that of course would
>> just be in theory.<g>
>>
>> As a bike, the Cross Check is an excellent bike with a 130mm wide single
>> speed hub.  And I can convert mine to a 1x8or9 in about a half hour.
>>
>> Eric Platt
>> St. Paul, MN
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, April 8, 2012 3:25:42 PM UTC-5, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Obviously, not everybody will want a single-speed conversion on a
>>> non-dedicated SS bike. My point was more to explain, in part, why maybe the
>>> SO/QB wasn't a better seller because of frames like the CC that, in
>>> function, do the same thing, for less dough.
>>>
>>> Another factor that I think relevant to lagging sales: my exhaustive
>>> demographic research suggests that RBW's target market is 58-year-old
>>> upper-middle income types who own multiple bikes (including, perhaps, a
>>> "vintage" frame that can be converted). Single-speed popularity tends to be
>>> driven, I dare say, by relative youngsters who have only one bike that they
>>> ride and lock up everywhere. It's not practical or fashionable in this crowd
>>> to have a nice/expensive/new bike. Far more street cred is attached to
>>> machines lovingly assembled from dumpster frames and parts.
>
>
> On Sunday, April 8, 2012 8:27:37 PM UTC-4, EricP wrote:
>>
>> Well, in theory, one could have a Surly Cross Check set up for single
>> speed, and still end up ordering a SimpleOne.  In part due to longer
>> chainstays, slightly lower bottom bracket, kewl green color and being the
>> last of the completely different Rivendell models.  But that of course would
>> just be in theory.<g>
>>
>> As a bike, the Cross Check is an excellent bike with a 130mm wide single
>> speed hub.  And I can convert mine to a 1x8or9 in about a half hour.
>>
>> Eric Platt
>> St. Paul, MN
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, April 8, 2012 3:25:42 PM UTC-5, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Obviously, not everybody will want a single-speed conversion on a
>>> non-dedicated SS bike. My point was more to explain, in part, why maybe the
>>> SO/QB wasn't a better seller because of frames like the CC that, in
>>> function, do the same thing, for less dough.
>>>
>>> Another factor that I think relevant to lagging sales: my exhaustive
>>> demographic research suggests that RBW's target market is 58-year-old
>>> upper-middle income types who own multiple bikes (including, perhaps, a
>>> "vintage" frame that can be converted). Single-speed popularity tends to be
>>> driven, I dare say, by relative youngsters who have only one bike that they
>>> ride and lock up everywhere. It's not practical or fashionable in this crowd
>>> to have a nice/expensive/new bike. Far more street cred is attached to
>>> machines lovingly assembled from dumpster frames and parts.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/R1HREkME7qcJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to