Eric: My brother weighs within 10 lb of you and happily rides well built 32
spoke wheels with no long term (let alone short term) problems; he uses no
more than 8 cogs in back, but then the same spacing and hubs serve for 9
and 10, no? Or are 8 speed/130 mm hubs stronger than 9-10 speed same?
Generally speaking he uses narrow to moderately wide tires: 23 to 38 or so.

Years ago when admittedly 20 lb lighter he commuted on 559 wheels built
with 28 spokes but carried a (heavy, early '90s Mac) laptop and other kit
in a messenger bag; he bunny hopped (he was proud that they stood up to
this abuse and announced this fact) those (Mavic rims and hubs) wheels all
over the place on his XO-2 with nary a wobbled wheel.

His best friend 15 years ago was already well north of 225 and rode 32s
constantly (700C) on light steel and CF racing frames -- he'd break frames
but not wheels. (He also rode 180 mm Topline Superlight cranks, which he
bent and had un-bent by the factory.)



On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:58 PM, EricP <ericpl...@aol.com> wrote:

> Agree with Jim here - my rim failure was on a fairly new rim (less
> than a week old), with less than 100 miles on it.  36 spokes.  Just
> happen to be a stone that cut really sharp and deep.
>
> Will admit to having one bike with 32 hole rims.  Otherwise,
> everything is 36 hole.  And even there I feel at 225 pounds am
> probably pushing the envelope and 40 or 48 hole would be more
> practical.
>
> To the OP, sorry but the new photos don't change my mind, but the
> middle photo is interesting.  If you can, take the rim tape off.
> Would not shock me if the inside of the rim was cracked.  Had that
> happen on a Synergy rim.  Almost forgot about that rim failure.
>
> Gee, makes me realize I'm harder than most on my rims.  Guess that
> what happens when one is a super heavyweight.
>
> Eric Platt
> St. Paul, MN
>
> On Dec 5, 10:10 am, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery <thill....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I would disagree that spoke count and symmetry are THAT important. I
> believe the bigger issue with low-spoke-count wheels is the skinny 125 psi
> tire they ride on.
> >
> > The reason I say that wheels with fewer spokes and more dish are ok
> (within reason) is because of modern rim stiffness. I probably wouldn't
> suggest the MA2 with 24 or 28 spokes for most riders, but with some kind of
> stiff deep-v style rim, fewer spokes are ok.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to